Predictive Medicine by Cytomics
Cell Biochemistry Group
1.1 Pharmaceuticals are typically developped according to best group (cohort) efficiency. Once approved they are applied to similar groups of patients. Some patients may, however, not benefit from a presently optimal therapy and are potentially harmed by unwanted therapeutic side effects (adverse drug reactions (ADRs)) despite the improved prognosis (=group future) of the entire patient group. This is suboptimal. Accurate predictions for the reactivity of the individual patient in such groups prior to therapy onset constitute therefore a primordial goal of predictive medicine by cytomics. Individualized disease course predictions will improve overall therapeutic efficiency, better comply with the " primum nil nocere" principle in medicine and meet the central patient interest to be cured of disease by an individually optimized therapy.
1.2 Predictive medicine by cytomics (molecular cell system analysis) (fig.1) aims at > 95% or higher accuracies for therapy related disease course or outcome predictions in individual patients by differential data pattern classification (predictive differentials, predictive differential classification) of molecular cell phenotypes or other molecular measurements in patients. Cells constitute the elementary function units of cell systems (cytomes), organs and organisms. Diseases are caused by molecular changes in cells. This means for the detection of early disease processes, cells know it first. Cytometry measurements can detect such altered molecular cell phenotypes resulting from genotype and exposure influences. In case disease inducing cells are not accessible, disease specific molecular patterns of immune indicator cells like cellular or humoral responses of lympho-/monocytes or granulocyte activation in blood or other body fluids can be probed instead.
Similar diseases may result from high genotypic susceptibility and low exposure or alternatively from low genotypic susceptibility at high exposure. The high genotypic diversity in man at a comparatively low number of possible diseases emphasizes the potential of molecular cell phenotypes as diagnostic, therapy guiding and outcome prediction indicators in individual patients. Instead of trying to cure patients according to individual genotype, it may be more promising to therapeutically address disease specific molecuar cell phenotypes thus considerably reducing the number of potential therapies.
fig.1 System cytometry and cell systems biology
1.3 Altered molecular cell phenotypes are determined as differential classification masks by iterative selection of the most discriminatory triple matrix patterns between diseased and healthy patients. The optimization process provides disease and patient classification masks (rightmost table columns) (hotspot heat masks). They represent direct or indirect molecular equivalents of disease processes. Classification masks can be established for diseased or disease associated cells like inflammatory immune cells. Either patterns may vary to a certain degree from patient to patient due to different combinations of genotype and exposure influences. This does, however, not influence the accuracy of the robust classification process. The individually optimal therapy (individualized medicine, personalized medicine) can be selected by data pattern classification of patient groups stratified for example according to Kaplan-Meier. The presented concept of personalized medicine concerns the care of diseased patients or of persons during disease development. It does not aim at the prediction of future disease occurrence from the person's individual genotype (transparent patient, vitreous man). The prediction of future disease from gene patterns remains difficult due to lack of knowledge about patient's future exposure situation. The concept has a wider application potential than the pharmacogenomics or predictive medicine by genomics approaches of personalized medicine. The algorithmically determined data patterns can be standardized. No statistical or correlation (dendrogram) analyses are used for the classification process.
1.4 Patients with a prediction for "disease aggravation" may convert under therapy within some time to "non-complication" patients such as e.g. in intensive care medicine. The early detection of disease aggravation or amelioration provides a lead time for preventive therapy onset or for therapy reduction (preventive medicine).
1.5 Therapeutic lead time may increase overall therapeutic efficiency by the prevention or reduction of disease induced irreversible tissue damage or of unwanted therapeutic side effects. It may also permit to identify risk patients prior to disease declaration like in asthma, rheumatic diseases or diabetes. This may help to delay disease outbreak and reduce complication rates as an important practical consequence.
1.6 Accuracy levels for individualized disease course predictions can be increased in principle from presently around 95% to 99% or higher upon merging the most informative parameters from different studies into the disease classification masks ("disease signatures"). The knowledge extraction by data pattern classification is independent of mathematical assumptions concerning the value distribution of parameters and the optimal classification is obtained unsupervised that is in an automated way with high certainty for the selection of the correct data pattern. The classification is also comparatively robust against the misclassification of random statistical aberrations as true aberrations.
1.7 The two-step research strategy consists of
i) hypothesis-driven (deductive approach)
determination of experimental molecular cell phenotype
parameters of diseased and healthy individuals, followed by ii)
hypothesis-free differential data pattern classification (analysis,
mining) for all investigated cells in their full heterogeneity.
The use of healthy patients as reference groups permits the elaboration of standardized classifiers (periodic system of cells) by the combined reclassification of the most discriminatory parameters of several experimental approaches. They are performed under different hypotheses (inductive approach) and other parameter patterns but on similar patient groups ("observing molecular medicine"). Data patterns with more and more discriminatory efficiency are obtained in this way by autofocusing. This may permit to identify new disease associated molecular hotspots, being presently inaccessible to hypothesis development due to the lack of preexisting knowledge.
This data-driven molecular top-down approach is initially comparatively independent of prior knowledge about the ultimate molecular causes of disease. In particular there is no need to first analyze the molecular effects of hypothesis driven systematic perturbations of cellular model systems as they are frequently used to acquire knowledge about disease affected molecular pathways. Subsequently these pathways are investigated in detail by the bottom-up concept of systems biology (system biology). Concept-driven research such as molecular cytome exploration, in contrast, analyzes differential molecular disease patterns in patient cells, thus avoiding the detour of investigating molecular pathways in unsuitable cellular model systems. The cytome approach provides information on therapy dependent future disease development in individual patients and has the potential to simplify investigations on disease mechanisms significantly.
1.8 Once a certain molecular knowledge has been assembled, disease inducing molecular pathways can be explored by a retrograde molecular analysis strategy (molecular reverse engineering) of molecular cell phenotype differentials at the cell systems level. The pathways can be mathematically modeled (biomedical cell systems biology) to further increase the predictive capacity. It is likely that new target molecules and lead structures for drug discovery will be detected by hypothesis-free data pattern classification due to its capacity to address unknown molecular knowledge spaces. In this sense cytomics represents an entry to biomedical cell systems biology.
1.9 The described classification concept concentrates the
differentially most informative molecular cell parameters within specific
disease classification masks
containing typically between
and 30 parameters.
It does not
advocate for the determination of ever increasing parameter sets generating
frequently interpretation difficulties at the individual patient level.
An initial goal of this effort is to build a system of standardized,
inter hospital exchangeable and individually predictive data classifiers for
patients, possibly within the framework of a
human cytome project.
The potential of the concept consists in its general applicability to various areas of clinical or ambulant medicine as illustrated below by collaborative projects with individual hospitals and institutions as well as within the framework of the European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis ( EWGCCA) in the context of clinical cytomics. The apparent challenge is to advance this effort to the patient level in a multistep effort of scientists, clinicians and industry as proposed in the context of the human cytome project (PPT, ref181, 1, 2, 3, ref175, ref170, concepts, definitions, cytomics references) or in the establishment of a periodic system of cells with stem cells or other cell compartments as reference. Despite ressemblance in name, this concept differs significantly from the earlier concept for a plant periodic cell system.
Download the ZIP file containing all Cell Biochemistry pages for example into directory: d:\classimed\, unzip into the same directory, enter the address: file:///d:/classimed/cellbio.html into the URL field of the Internet browser to directly access text & figures on your harddisk free of network delays (further information).
|© 2019 G.Valet|